Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour


Submitted on
September 14, 2013
Image Size
9.6 KB


241 (1 today)
21 (who?)
Circumcision Double Standards by Maliciouses Circumcision Double Standards by Maliciouses
I absolutely HATE this double standard. Both gender circumcisions are wrong.

You know those feminazis who say "omg FEMAL CIRCUMCISUN IS CROOL N WRONG!1!!1"
But then they're like "MALE CIRCUMCISUN IS OK THO. THOS STOPID MEN!111!"
Add a Comment:
QueenieSeas Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2014  Student Digital Artist
I'm anti-circumcision. 

My husband to be is intact, and it's awesome. Why would anyone hack off something as awesome as foreskin? It makes sex epic.
BigEaterYogi Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2014
Both of them are wrong.
curiousprintery Featured By Owner Feb 18, 2014
Male circumcision can go awfully wrong but the exremer forms of female circumcision are much more invasive, dagerous, even deadly, painful and remove the ability to feel any pleasure at all. Having said that I am against both and it should be the decision of the teen/adult.
Taena-Doman Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
The human right of the integrity of the own body and thus also human dignity is a high value. Both gender circumcisions are absolutely wrong, because they circumcise (literally) this high value. So, the circumcision of male babies or young boys is as an abuse as female circumcision/mutilation, because these children have no possibility to choice if they want this or not and I really compare it with a violation against someone's body.
I am actually horrified that there is still a need to discuss this in the 21th century.

Thank you for making this stamp.:):)
Maliciouses Featured By Owner Dec 23, 2013
At first, I thought this was going to be a counter-comment. :XD:
You're very welcome. I'm glad we think alike.
Taena-Doman Featured By Owner Dec 24, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Thank you.:):)

Well, it's a hard to discuss, without coming into an emotional debate, which is understandable.
Of course, female circumcision is much more horrible as the male one...however, in both cases human rights are abused.
IronBatMaiden91 Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2013
Both are wrong as hell! Thank God that we don't live in Old Testament times.
GingaFreak11 Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2013  Student Writer
Male circumcision is horrible! Let it be his choice, after he grows up, he should be able to decide! It's not the parents choice to ruined their son's life by breaking their sperm count in half (yes, if you're circumcised, you'll have a shit ton of problems having children!
minustwoseventhree Featured By Owner Sep 21, 2013
Uh. Well I see both as completely wrong, but female circumcision is an entirely different thing to male circumcision.
Female circumcision is done usually so that sex cannot be enjoyable, meaning that women are discouraged from engaging in sexual activities because it is not pleasurable or downright painful. Why? Because females having sex is wrong, obviously! The idea in its very self is misogynist and disgusting.

Secondly, female circumcision is never performed by specialists because it's illegal - meaning people use tools that are dirty and they haven't been trained to operate on people.
And finally - the blood supply there is huge. Young girls can bleed to death or at least end up seriously ill from the loss of blood.

That's completely different to male circumcision, which is by no means right, but not nearly as damaging. 
Maliciouses Featured By Owner Sep 22, 2013
I know that it's entirely different, if I said it was the same I'd be saying that women have penises. :|
I think that second paragraph is part of my point, female circumcision is wrong, but male circumcision isn't?? Yes, female circumcision is "worse" in a moral sense, both are wrong.
Add a Comment: